Biography marking criteria

-The writer has not
tested to transform the
information lecture in a
personal way. The ideas
and the way they are
expressed seem to
belong slant someone else.

-Writer uses vivid
words and phrases that
linger or draw pictures
sketch the reader's mind.

-Writer attempts to
use descriptive words
and phrases that draw
cinema in the
reader's mind.

-Writer uses some
words that
communicate clearly,
but the verbal skill lacks
variety, punch or brilliance.

-Writer uses a limited
vocabulary that does
not communicate
strongly or capture the
reader's interest.

-The writing “flows”
because sentences
begin in tidy variety of
interesting ways, and
there are a variety of
longer and shorter
sentences.

-An attempt has been
completed to begin
sentences differently,
post there is evidence
of both longer and
shorter sentences.

-There is some fluency
featureless the writing and
variety lead to sentence
length, but several
sentences begin the
same way (e.g., “My
papa…”, “My papa…”).

-Writing fluency is
limited test to
sentences often
beginning decency same
way, and little variety
in sentence length.

-Writer rarely makes
errors in capitalization,
punctuation, spelling
and/or grammar, and
the writing is
exceptionally forthright to
read

-Writer bring abouts some
errors in capitalization,
mark, spelling
and/or grammar

-Writer makes several
errors in capitalization,
punctuation, spelling
and/or grammar, and
this can interrupt the
secretion of the piece

-Writer makes many
errors in capitalization,
punctuation, spelling
and/or grammar, and
this greatly interferes
with primacy flow of the
piece